ALEXANDER J M H R DOBRE
Living Will [Advanced Directive/Decision]
Revision 27/06/2015
05/08/2012 Private Constitution of Alexander Dobre by use in reference of the United nations Declaration of Human Rights and underlying Principles of the same body and conventions entailed by the title incorporating all documents associated to the "legal" or fundamental pursuits and "interests", of the author from conception as outlined under domestic international, European and domestic laws, hence the cogent interests of the author, MR. Alexander Dobre.
The Living Will does incorporate all former documents relevant to Mr. Dobre for the interests of Mr Dobre as outlined in this document under such legislation relevant to the title. The psychiatric living will is incorporated in this document and may be made available or attached. The psychiatric living will is authored by The Citizens Commission on Human Rights international and has been submitted to authorities in England, Scotland, and Wales and in interpretation Canada.
The legal prerogative of the document was breached by several authorities by reason and “interpretation” of law, hence its pending application and relief.
The Mandate of The Citizens Commission on Human Rights does represent the interests of the author of this document and is incorporated in this document. Such material made available by The Citizens Commission may be used as evidence. This "constitution", "living will", and "advanced directive" represents my interests from the first "subjective", "coercion" and such liability from any and all harm caused subjectively by the queried science in legislated countries, including the interpreted iatrogenic condition as interpreted by the author ,supportive studies, empirical evidence , organizations, literature, and publications, supportive with a mandate or legal interpretation like the author ,the terminology, definitions used in this document entirely, and any mandated dependence on medications that may also have been sanctioned(owned), hence the interpreted liability of the ,"practitioners" by virtue and application of relevant legislation in a reasonable sense as interpreted by the author and the author’s use of legislation to prevent further discriminations and to query by law such discriminations as harm caused including the causing of societal transgression to a significant degree typical of the science and that such transgression was caused by the "practitioners", of that body including medicine by fraternal nomenclature and any authority implicated by fraternity or in a reasonable and polite sense, those implicated and thus in question without limitations by opinion of the author of this document and supportive evidence such as a sworn declaration, or any body of knowledge permitted by the United Nation’s assertion on freedoms of religion, politics, belief, interpretation and the right to such manifestations of any literature or the apparent evidence on the observance of a society and the behaviour of its "practitioners" also as individuals in a social society, in a reasonable sense with the same obligations under law as the public of a country without exception except that such persons must be scrutinized for their behaviour on the basis that they are responsible for administering to a people.
Those people with such responsibility are in question based on reasonable interpreted bias possessed by those individuals in my interpretation. It is legislated that they may not "practice" in law medicine, government nor with vulnerable peoples should they in private or public have consistently maintained immunity to themselves on the subject of ethics law and their behaviour in a reasonable society. It is the opinion of this lay person ,legal representative , private investigator ,and lobby that is private, existing under license laws as an Non-Government Organization or that is constitutional or is a social person in a society defending himself and such politics , that is an occasional hobby person, without charity and author of this legal document. The majority of these persons have discriminations (scrutinize or select through a natural order) against people in the sectarian sense of fraternity based on such theories on an existence related to Thanatos or a premorbid split. What is observable is that these persons may or may not have been "religious" or “ritualistic", in their relationships with persons in a society based on intricate interpretations of a person’s social status, age, income, colour, nationality, association politics, belief, expression and nomenclature.
Requirements of Alexander Dobre, born in Johannesburg South Africa Oct. 7th 1971
Mr. Dobre does support the Citizens Commission on Human Rights and is a contributing member. In this sense Mr. Dobre understands that there is a very high statistical rate of abuse.
Visible conscience (consciousness) does refer to identity and individuality. Fundamental conscience and perception are the very fundaments which define a person and reflect on the way people associate with each other. Mr. Dobre’s visible conscience (consciousness) is owned by Mr.Dobre. Mr. Dobre does consider that certain treatments may constitute a false accusation about his behaviour and or beliefs and practices and are/were stigmatizing and therefore a threat to his reputation and physical and mental wellbeing. Any treatments given against Mr. Dobre’s expressed wishes are an intrusion upon, and thus an assault on Mr.Dobre’s body and constitute in Mr. Dobre’s views criminal assault.
Should Mr.Dobre be required (in interpretation) to have treatment for schizophrenia and or psychosis, Mr. Dobre considers Olanzapine or chlorpromazine orally to be less intrusive (directs only such treatment in the event of schizophrenia or psychosis on the basis that other such treatments distinctly make him sick and are considered torture by Mr. Dobre and the Citizens Commission on Human Rights. Olanzapine and chlorpromazine are more closely parallel to Mr. Dobre’s ideal treatment wishes of tegrettol (Olanzapine or Chlorpromazine) for (consumer oriented views) treatment to caused epilepsy-like behaviour reaction syndromes when Mr. Dobre is sleepy and not overt and having to deal with an offensive normalcy.
Mr. Dobre is not educated in Medicine or psychiatry but is an educated consumer who has described symptoms for example narcoleptic-like (occluded) behaviour (exhaustion and hyperactivity). Mr. Dobre's Consumer descriptions have been contrived as different syndromes most of the time and intentionally. Mr. Dobre feels better when overt. Mr. Dobre's occluded (ness) he associates with learning difficulties also and epileptic-like yelling perhaps associated to other PTSD symptoms such as hyper arousal followed by pain, exhaustion and several other related symptoms. (According to CCHR and Mind Freedom international such symptoms may be caused additionally from treatment for Schizophrenia.
Circumstances:
The body known as mental health is in question by pursuant including appendages and representatives of that body not excluding The British legal Barr, (specifically lawyers claiming to have represented the author and who are said to have specialized training to interpret and assist disabled people with vulnerabilities ,and additionally persons of poor economic status) complaint bodies and as such those of a celebrated fraternity or nepotism that are of a significant infringement on the author.
Reasoning : The Politics of societies specifically pertaining to the specialized body of health in EU countries predominantly, in allowable interpretation under international law, and bodies of domestic law, including police lawyers ,judiciaries, complaints groups, and legal associations where acts of a specific and or "ritualistic" "discrimination" (or normalcy) have taken place, and where such acts of discrimination were of a distinct form of criminal assaults on the author of a wide and significant nature by persons or persons with the "authority", in a county ,jurisdiction or in legislated interpretation of the author (those in legal question by author, in advance hence the term private constitution[EU 94,UN 49 91].
I direct that should I be considered ,"Legally" or otherwise under any form of complaint that is unreasonable or that the complaint is a form of anti-social hate (parsimony) or volition interpreted by the author in advance by the contents and politics of this document, I direct that such "discriminatory" complaint is investigated by myself, the author (this specifically refers to the application of complaint with relief additionally as intervention),in advance, and that should the author be unable for any reason to investigate ,query or draw or request proceedings, or commence allegations against the party not excluding authority or anyone associated , such as a form of practitioner or civilian, then due to the "specialized query that the author draws on distinct politics the representative allocated on the basis of "private religion (interpretation or practice)", that means are made on the "distinct" principles and "claims" in this document , or suggestions by civil or domestic application against any forms of complaints that were monistic, meant to attack distinct politics of coexistence, that were not social or reasonable within reasonable perimeters and that the complaint is in bias and that by the complaint that I cannot communicate overtly because the other party is or was offensive because they have asserted that this person has no right to coexist in the family or community sense or to engage persons in the overt community, family, or social, informal and formal sense (in context) in interpretation or in a reasonable sense or human sense, understood by the author’s interpretation (myself) . Mr.Dobre is interested in taking the view that there should be no limitations on the liability of certain proceedings and other acts considered liabilities, private, and corporate. This should not exclude government owned institutions such as review pannels or associated proceedings.
Such representative may be of any distinction foreign or otherwise by mandate (of legal aid)(except where associated to the other party). Should the author be considered to be under any form of “ arbitrary” complaint ,not excluding that the parties had comited offences against the author which they deemed as a normalcy such as the observance of areas said to benefit disabled persons disabled where they absolutely did not.
This is not limited to people of income, social status, education, fraternity, government or authority, as individuals or professionals liable to civil or criminal allegations of any form of discriminatory complaint who have asserted income or authority as a role, and additionally a disseminator or a totalitarian autonomy including those of authority or practicing medicine.
By reason of legislated right to opinion ,here in "advance", by the author and such right to the legislated manifestation of belief, here to coexist absent of the split state of thanatos , understood by all as scientific fact or a pre-morbid split [R.D. Laing “Phenomenology of existential psychiatry”], or otherwise based on the "authors views" ,that refers to definitions of rights to social affiliation with groupings of peoples such as religious groups leagues or individuals of," gender, age, race , colour ,religion or politics, referring to association, friendship, acts or association politics (The context here refers to Scientology survival dynamics and how consciousness cessation would affect those dynamics). Religion refers to social existence in a reasonable society non hedonistic.
What is opposed by the author is a particular form of hate (parsimony)(volition) by the body of gestalt, social sciences, medicine or such obedient (on behalf of this linear person)peoples, Countering such endowment of reasonable freedoms by legislated interpretation of author is unreasonable by legislated applications of author because the intervention is of a significant degree and symptoms or problems are statistically known to be caused or complicated by the health bodies, individuals and persons associated.
These people in my case may not be paid by domestic pockets to falsely indoctrinate our communities. Here I refer to the administering to communities by empirical vestibules such as any form of clinic that is not impartial to private autonomy (refers to a community with unlicensed energies also) of a people or person in a community or country of sovereignty more amiable to such independent appreciation of life and the life instinct. I direct in advance the right to Nomadism considered to be Talmud (ic) in private campaign and canvas of the private interests of the author hence further the right to relocate at any time to any country, but specifically as legislated, the author being mindful of all means that may be even communistic survival or any legislated habituation incorporated in the "private" "religion" of the author. No practitioner of any kind may draw derogatory conclusions from this legislated right under EU and International law, furthered by prerogative of the sub category "advanced directive" ,incorporating all directives in this document.
Contents
I direct and or reserve the right in advance to renunciation under the British citizenship act and that British and or Canadian Citizenship are fully renounced should I chose to do so at any time because of legal offences committed against the author by such (application of views or distinct conscience) persons committing conscious acts with the authority of a country.
Where persons knowingly or consciously have committed acts considered tangible or that it is known that intangible acts have been constant enough that their behaviour or tangible behaviour causes damaging effects or forms proximate patters, and sets precedents for organized behaviour (rewarded or payed) as a "food chain behaviour" towards the author or any (the author specifically) individual or their conscience(this may specifically include the use of medicine or conscious diagnosis to set precedents of conscious behaviour towards the author and constants of rewarded behaviour by employees or those associated to the NHS or relative health organisation, and their practitioners, in interpretation of the author by reason of the United Nations Dec of Human Rights and underlying papers which represent the basis for human behaviour and remain as the central documents on the observation of law ,choice , intuition and freedom.
Reference here does pertain to the body of public knowledge owned by CCHR international ( http://www.CCHR.ORG ), the psychiatric survivors movement and the published work of R.D Laing (psychiatric survivor context), and in part the body of scientology. Where the state becomes incriminated by educated negligence, bodies it licenses or persons employed by the state or country there must be precedent relief.
The author reserves right to conscience, any relief for the cessation of conscience or consciousness ,intuition, perception, religion, the manifestation and teaching of such religion as humanity and the right not to be subject to eugenic aging, ,( encapsulation/encysting), or other relative acts committed by any health organization, surgery or practice and its members considered to be very large social groupings applicable at all levels by decree of the United Nations (in interpretation referring to the Nuremburg Charter) on the basis of the free choice of the author to such pursuits of liberty, social, political and religious freedoms, (Happiness)including perception and , reasonable fundamentals of a society or community consisting of such family[sci. noun] as a community or collective person or entity known as a collective conscience or collective being or (consciousness)person.
Mr Dobre does not support Mr Peter Vamous, The Province of Quebec, The portage re-adaptation program, The Portage Adolescent re-adaptation program or such auspices identifying as a eugenic mob. I direct also that such legislated means are made to facilitate such temporary or permanent integration into the society or "country of choice” should I wish to do . This means that LEGISLATED assistance is given by the LEGISLATED and "advanced", choice (document title). The study and practice of Russian or relevant language to the community of the authors interest must be facilitated by advanced prerogative of this directive known as "the interests of the client (person) " by available tuitions, programs and financial resources available to the author for the chosen school(people) of language.
That Mr. Dobre does not support the interests of sanctioned communities of (Quebec/Canada)any countries nationals is not what is meant by the lack of support for the former Canadian Development Agency notorious for missing people as with Portage. (This short note is in support of the Nuremburg charter on the ad Hoc Geneva Convention and refers to Yugoslavia)
In addition to that, what is meant is that a tremendous amount of discernment and empathy considered as understanding must be extended to such persons regardless.
It is considered that such persons responsible for them or acts are such persons considered leaders or persons who have lacked the propensity in this regard which reflects the silent motives or lack of understanding in justice or human motive.
I direct that investigations absent of fraternity ideology be carried out against person who have failed to carry out reasonable instruction from her Majesty’s client (citizen) or who have failed to represent the interests of the author or other persons as mandated by legal aid, hence the author or the rules of the jurisdictional legal association wherever applicable in interpretation of the author in advance.
This does further refer to such harm caused in other countries by reasons outlined in this document hence the "existence" of such states as described in this document as the observable politics of English societies in other countries. Such scrutiny refers predominantly to the body known as mental health lawyers and the author’s "advanced", right to query "their" acts in the legal and reasonable sense from conception of the author.
Mr. Dobre does emphasise that he has had severe learning and visual (stigmatism) difficulties. When younger Mr. Dobre w/ out success was engaged in learning preparation... evidently Mr. Dobre has not received adequate help for learning difficulties or other severe impairments. Mr. Dobre has attested to symptoms of Dyscalculia/ADHD which included un-educated attempts to prevent cessation of conscious and to point out very ugly acts committed by large groupings of people which have effected Mr. Dobre’s reputation in the sense that those persons perhaps believed themselves eligible for certain (un-specific) chartered wealth on the basis that they believed they may commit any act because they believed themselves to be extra anthropomorphic. Mr. Dobre is disabled and attests that there may have been intentional acts of misdiagnosis based on the reputation of the parties by public knowledge published by the citizen’s commission on human rights which Mr. Dobre does benefit from. Mr. Dobre does believe he benefits from specific use of physical medicines excluding significant conscious cessation medicine, and that such medicine was used for primitive purposes.
Mr. Dobre is disabled and benefits from services available to the disabled w/ in the EU or elsewhere. This may not be contrived as a disability.
I direct in advance that "housing" by my advanced directive is always private[Mr. Dobre should always be in control of his housing] and "independent", and where any form of medical treatment has caused injury as testified by the author, that such disability caused, or not is also noteworthy by the declaration of the principles in this document to any severity and or severity requiring an enforceable compensation, that unique treatment by the practice of a specializing jurisdiction where the legislated beliefs of the author such as his health are not infringed upon by any conflicting practicing body faculty or university or institution in the reasonable sense.
Mr. Dobre directs that he does not give any part of himself for medical purposes and should not be asked to do so or it would be interpreted as offensive... I direct that in no circumstance are injectable drugs to be used on myself in the case of the body of mental health and in this case by reason of the prerogative of the sub category of this constitution known as an advanced directive. I further direct that at all times I should be in control of my own estate and finances as described in this paper. Mr. Dobre attests to be a victim of hacking, voyeurism, encapsulation, document corruption, and additionally learning impairments which absolutely should reflect on the related persons.
I direct the "advanced" right to pursue significant "enforceable compensations" and "remedies" under applicable laws in every significant instance where I have been violated fundamentally.
In the case that Mr. Dobre dies he directs that he be cremated absolutely, and the ashes transported to a desolate place in the European Alps Where he should decompose with the earth and incense used, where it may permitted. The ceremony should be in English and the country’s dominant language w/ in the Alps. Psalms of religious absolutism and the use of significant amounts of incense to ensure the natural process of this will are directed. It is preferred that the cremation be done in the country where Mr. Dobre should decompose. The Afforded means (whatever is in the means of Mr. Dobre) is directed. (It is suggested that Wizz air is utilized for affordability along with other means. The incense should be placed in the earth where the funeral is to take place. Plenty of incense should be used.
Alexander Dobre
